I have a long-standing question: HOW DO I COMMUNICATE WITH THOSE WHO THINK AND BELIEVE THE POLAR OPPOSITE OF WHAT I THINK AND BELIEVE?
IS THERE A REASONABLE WAY TO BRIDGE SUCH A GAP?
Is it best to skirt the topics that could engage us in conflict?
Asserting one’s truth in a way that “annihilates” the other person’s truth, making them 100% wrong isn’t a way to foster communication.
In this world of diversity, variety, multiplicity, it seems unreasonable to expect that there is a one-size-fits-all point of view. Humanity is more of a bouquet with each distinct flower asserting its right to be!
So, in agreeing to disagree, is that a way to bridge the gap? Or if the gap is too large and
spanning it doesn’t seem possible, what then?
My younger and older brothers along with my older sister hold passionate political beliefs that are far right of my own. The odd thing is that the leadership that they support isn’t very different from the way our father ruled the household. This is the very father they rebelled against. I wonder why they don’t see what I see. Loving them, do I hold them at arm’s length especially when they forcefully deliver their diatribe?
I came across this quote as I was rearranging some papers this morning:
We are all
full of wonder
I’m open to your thoughts on the matter.